| Location | Languages Available |
|---|---|
| Argentina | |
| Bermuda | |
| Brazil | |
| Canada | |
| Chile | |
| Colombia | |
| Costa Rica | |
| El Salvador | |
| Guatemala | |
| Honduras | |
| Mexico | |
| Nicaragua | |
| Panama | |
| Peru | |
| United States | |
| Venezuela |
| Location | Languages Available |
|---|---|
| Australia | |
| China | |
| Hong Kong (China, SAR) | |
| India | |
| Indonesia | |
| Japan | |
| Korea | |
| Malaysia | |
| New Zealand | |
| Philippines | |
| Singapore | |
| Taiwan | |
| Thailand | |
| Vietnam |
| Location | Languages Available |
|---|---|
| Austria | |
| Belgium | |
| Croatia | |
| Czech Republic | |
| Denmark | |
| Finland | |
| France | |
| Germany | |
| Greece | |
| Hungary | |
| Ireland | |
| Italy | |
| Kazakhstan | |
| Luxembourg | |
| Netherlands | |
| Norway | |
| Poland | |
| Portugal | |
| Romania | |
| Serbia | |
| Slovakia | |
| Spain | |
| Sweden | |
| Switzerland | |
| Turkey | |
| Ukraine | |
| United Kingdom |
| Location | Languages Available |
|---|---|
| Cameroon | |
| Congo | |
| Egypt | |
| Ghana | |
| Ivory Coast | |
| Israel | |
| Jordan | |
| Kenya | |
| Kuwait | |
| Mauritius | |
| Nigeria | |
| Saudi Arabia | |
| Senegal | |
| South Africa | |
| UAE | |
| Uganda |
By Elaine Hwang and William Chow | December 1, 2025
What is Full Portability?
How will it work?
The process will, in principle, follow the existing ECA framework:
How the mechanism will work exactly is yet to be published, but it will no doubt leverage on the eMPF Platform, making it more efficient than the existing ECA framework for employees to set up a new account with a new MPF provider and instruct a transfer.
The target implementation date for Phase 1 is sometime in 2026, following completion of full onboarding to the eMPF Platform.
Full Portability vs Employer offering multiple MPF Schemes
Full portability is NOT intended to replace the option for employers to offer MPF scheme choices to their employees, as the two arrangements have different features and serve distinct purposes:
| Key Features | Full Portability | Employer offering multiple MPF schemes |
|---|---|---|
| Coverage | Mandatory accounts only | Mandatory and voluntary accounts |
| Choice | Employees choose any MPF scheme in the market | Employees choose among MPF schemes offered by their employers |
| Transferable account balances | Entire mandatory account balance | Decided by employers |
| Transfer frequency | Once a year | Decided by employers |
| Management fee | Standard fees only | Fee rebates may be offered |
| Transfer process | Initiated by employees via eMPF platform | Arranged by employers |
| Scheme comparison | Employees conduct their own research on MPF schemes in the market | Employers are likely to provide comparisons of MPF schemes offered to help employees make informed decisions. |
Each arrangement has its own pros and cons. Employers considering adding more MPF schemes and provide more choice to employees are encouraged to work with their consultants to review their existing arrangements and to determine the most suitable approach.
Conclusion
The MPFA strongly supports Full Portability and is committed to working closely with employers to ensure a smooth transition and clear communication throughout the process. In the interim, employers should watch out for upcoming developments and proactively prepare for the changes ahead.

